How can I give a hand struggle HIV/AIDS contained by Africa?
My global behaviour plan is to fight aids within Africa. So please give me any concept on how I can help to disagree aids in Africa minus to actually have to go nearby. This is for my Global Isuues class.
Answer:
You should do your research first about the truth of theh HIV/AIDS epidemic.
Read the following interview for the truth almost HIV/AIDS.
Interview with molecular biologist and former Harvard and Johns Hopkins professor Charles A. Thomas, Ph.D.
RETHINKING: If HIV does not result in AIDS, what does?
THOMAS: I think that Duesberg and Root-Bernstein enjoy it right. Anything or process that destroys the individual's ability to mount an immune response to adventitious disease such as those tabled by the CDC as "AIDS indicator diseases." This could be the use of street drugs such as cocaine, heroin, amyl nitrite (poppers), amphetamines, which are known to be immunosuppressive. It could be famine and lack of essential vitamins. Being the receiver of whole blood or blood products, such as required by hemophiliacs, inhibits the immune system. Finally, in attendance is much evidence that repeated and multiple infections are immunosuppressive. The immune system just get worn out and can't respond.
RETHINKING: What about AZT?
THOMAS: DNA synthesis and cell division are essential to mount an immune response. AZT kill replicating cells. AZT within a sense can be a cause of AIDS diseases. The merciful loses hair, and the proliferating intestinal epithelia are destroyed.
RETHINKING: But AZT kill the HIV...
THOMAS: AZT kills any bit of DNA that tries to replicate. It is a crazy means of access to attempt to kill the HIV virus because so few Lymphocytes are carrying a copy of HIV (1/10,000) and the viral copy is merely about 1/100,000 of the size of the host cell DNA. Besides, where on earth is the evidence that the incorporated virus is doing any harm at adjectives? Yet Burroughs-Welcome's figures indicate that 200,000 inhabitants world-wide receive AZT every day at the cost of $2,300 per year.
RETHINKING: How do you explain the passing of Kimberly Bergalis, who was a virgin and did not do drugs?
THOMAS: Kimberly Bergalis, according to the nonspecific press, was a babyish lady who be found to have antibody to HIV; she have become infected at some time in the recent past. Whether she displayed other AIDS symptoms, I do not know, but she was put on AZT. She responded merely as described above; the AZT killed her.
RETHINKING: How do you explain Ryan White?
THOMAS: According to accounts surrounded by the press, Ryan White be an 18-year-old hemophiliac who died in April of 1990 of unstoppable internal bleeding which may own been exacerbated by the AZT he be taking. Not an unusual way for hemophiliacs to die. To prove that HIV be the cause of his extermination would require the comparison of similar hemophiliacs both with and short antibody to HIV. Notwithstanding, his death proved to be the drive for the passing of the Ryan White Comprehensive Research Act within 1990 which is giving more than $550 million to hospitals and clinics around the country.
RETHINKING: Well, what about Magic Johnson, said to be on AZT?
THOMAS: I don't know whether he in reality is or not. He is smart enough to know it is useless, toxic and avoid taking it. My own bet is that Johnson is not taking AZT; he would never be capable of play the basketball he does. However, if he is taking it, it would not surprise me if he were more robust to its not a hundred percent effects than Kimberly or Ryan.
RETHINKING: How did Kimberly Bergalis become infected with HIV?
THOMAS: I don't know, and probably neither does anyone else. Thanks to the publicity that this luggage received, everyone thinks that she be infected by her dentist David Acer, who was HIV+. This lead to testing 1,100 of his other olden patients, 4 or 5 of whom proved to have antibody to HIV+. Divide 4.5 by 1100, and you draw from 0.4%. Subsequent testing of masses thousands o~ patients of other dentists showed that 0.4% of them were positive. The frequency of HIV+ have been repeatedly measured within the general population since 1985 at 0.4%. There is no explanation to think she be infected by her dentist.
RETHINKING: How do you explain babies with AIDS?
THOMAS: According to the CDC diskettes as of the lapse of 1991, there enjoy been a total of 1,328 babies (age<l) record as having AIDS since the naissance of 1981. This is a very small number covering a interval of 11 years. It turns out that 1,260 (95%) of these came from "mothers at risk." This category is chiefly drug abusing mothers. Babies born to drug abuse mothers who do not have HIV also die from equal diseases, but they are not considered AIDS victims.
RETHINKING: How do you explain the transfusion and hemophiliac cases who are dying from AIDS?
THOMAS: If you focus on the transfusion recipients, those have antibody to HIV are actually living roughly speaking as long as those without HIV antibody. More work should be done on this point (because recipient of multiple transfusions become immunosuppressed and also are more likely to acquire HIV), but the available evidence indicates that exposure to HIV does not hasten their death. There are about 11,000 HIV+ hemophiliacs contained by the U.S. that have be infected for 10 years. Of these only 1,713 (15.6%) enjoy developed AIDS. The bulk of the remainder will die natural death before they come down beside AIDS diseases. Bob Maver has covered this contained by the second issue of Rethinking AIDS.
RETHINKING: We have be told that there is a rampant explosion of heterosexual AIDS among teenagers; how can this be controlled?
THOMAS: Well, in truth, an analysis of the CDC data to 6/30/92 shows that at hand were solitary 872 cases of teenage (13-19) AIDS over olden times 11 years. The majority of these are homosexual, IV drug abusers and hemophilia cases. The number of cases of heterosexual teenage AIDS not involving these other risk factor is only 16 over an 11 year time. Hardly an explosion, and hardly numbers warrant a "safe sex" fight involving tens of millions of teenagers.
RETHINKING: What about Africa?
THOMAS: I don't know anything something like AIDS in Africa, and can simply wonder if others do. Remember that people are dying adjectives the time in Africa of CDC-approved AIDS diseases (dysentery, for example) as a result of malnourishment, infections, etc. Now roughly speaking 10% of the population (plus/minus 10%) is estimated to have antibody to HIV. That could be true or it could be a elevated estimate due to sloppy testing. Anyhow, if you mark HIV+, and die of a CDC-approved disease, you die of AIDS. That's why the numbers are so high within Africa. One interesting point: while about 3% of the HIV positive ancestors come down with AIDS respectively year in the U.S., within Africa only a tiny percentage do so. This is because the percentage of HIV+ (10%) is so much larger than within the U.S. (° 4%)
Africa is interesting in another agency: the percentage of males and females who are HIV-positive is the same. AIDS disease affect both sexes at like rate. In the U.S., 80% of the AIDS cases are in 20-44 year-olds, 90% of whom are males. It looks similar to AIDS disease are being cause in a different approach in Africa than contained by the U.S. (and Western Europe).
RETHINKING: Don't chimpanzees get AlDS when infected next to HIV?
THOMAS: No they don't and that's a problem. About 80 chimps have be tested. The HIV infects these animals, multiplies, elicits the formation of antibody, and after disappears, just resembling in humans. Even after oodles years not one chimp has come down next to AIDS diseases. This means we own an animal model for HIV, and it does not seem to bring AIDS. In this respect they are just approaching the 1,000,000 Americans who have be infected with HIV and who are not coming down beside AIDS either.
RETHINKING: Everyone agrees that in that is plenty of HIV virus in semen and that's how it spreads.
THOMAS: Well, in fact there's not. The best work done at the Women's and Brigham Hospital in Boston shows that by the most sensitive PCR and culture procedures, no virus can be detected contained by 90% of the semen samples taken from men near AIDS. This is not surprising. In the HIV-immune individual, HIV is present only within a tiny minority of white blood cells, and these cell are screened out of the seminal plasma, in recent times as they are from breast milk and saliva.
RETHINKING: so safe sex is ridiculous?
THOMAS: There is no sheltered sex. Including gunshot wounds, marital discord, litigation and financial cost, sex is one of the more dangerous events. But that is not what you intended. It is well-established that sex-particularly alert anal sex- can transmit a number of venereal diseases which may contribute to the "infectional overload" mentioned above and immune depression, but it is an extremely inefficient agency to transmit HIV. Sex is no more dangerous today than 20 years ago - or 1,000 years ago.*
Here are some biddable google videos beside the truth about HIV/AIDs.
For the truth give or take a few HIV/AIDS check out the following links!
Deconstruting the Myth of AIDS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
HIV AIDS – Fact or Fiction
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
Check out http://www.joinred.com. It is a product purchase site that supports The Global Fund. A group that helps mêlée AIDS/HIV in Africa. You simply purchase products that you could buy elsewhere.
okay first you buy a years supply of rubbers, birth control and not to mention some **** money so they can get out of poverty. within the end it comes down to educating citizens.
through advertisements! sex is accurate but how about your vigour!so they must learn how to treat individual as a existing people not approaching prostitutes.they need to respect one another!