Why do practitioners and believers of quackery spell so inadequately?
Do you think your dearth of education might be blinding you to the truth? i.e. that homeoaquackathy and other quackery is made-up and doesn't work?
Answer: Nail. Head. Hit.
Could it be that your inability to reap any benefits from a holistic approach is due to your hostility toward the entire concept? Not everyone who practices uplifting is a quack. I do agree that poor grammar and spelling detracts from ones credibility. However, the propensity to spell is not an indicator of great wisdom. I enjoy O levels, A level, two diplomas and a degree. I am a qualified nurse. Yet I am also a mould therapist and am training to be a nutritional psychotherapist.
I am far from stupid. I have contained by the past given you links to research into rub therapy that proves the effects and benefits.
I'll furnish them to you again just surrounded by case you didn't look end time.
http://www6.miami.edu/touch-research/
The Touch Research Institute, founded by Dr. Tiffany Field has done a large amount of research into the positive and healing effects of touch.
Ashley Montagu, a world renowned anthropologist wrote a book call "Touching:The human Significance of the Skin".
Read it. But I doubt you will.
I've know homeopaths who were extraordinarily intelligent and well-educated .. it always amazed me that it could be so, but it's a certainty. Even some medical doctors are true believers. I guess they tend to be a bit gullible, but they also believe research studies that probably weren't all that well-designed contained by my opinion.
However aside from homeopathy, I imagine there are masses valid alternative treatments such as herbs. Lots of standard medicine started out as herbs that might enjoy had a dubious reputation until studied further. And much of modern nutritional practice to promote well brought-up health be considered quackery, back surrounded by the days when the ideal lunchtime for good vigour would have be a one lb steak and a potato with gob of butter and sour cream.
There was a time when smoking be not considered to be harmful by heaps doctors, while intense exercise (running or weightlifting) was believed to be adverse by some. It's often complicated to tell when an opinion will move from quakery to established medical practice.
Like who, for instance. You continue to gross broad meaningless comments about other general public - never backing your statements up near anything substantial.
As a long-time reading specialist I can tell you that a study be done of dyslexic children with highly high IQ's who go on in duration to become medical doctors, earning doctorate surrounded by many other field, etc. - some of whom always have difficulty reading and most continued to have spelling problems adjectives their life.
"Eye see a spelling chequer
It came near my pea sea
It plainly marque four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot marine.
Eye strike a key and type a word
And solidity four it two say
Weather eye am wrong oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.
As soon as a mist hurting is maid
It nose bee fore two long
And eye can put the error rite
Its irregular lea ever wrong.
Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its message perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew."
Perhapz it iz becoz they iz not educatud? homeoaquackathy
What the heck kinda word is that??
You sure did miss notice your little red underline spell checker on that one!
Dictionary definition please!
Oh and support if it is Websters or Morten W's
Do you dream up that your lack of a brain might be binding you to becoming the biggest bore on AnQnA.coms? I earn a degree contained by history. I changed gears a few years ago. I returned to school and become a nurse. i later commenced studying alternative medicine. i do not think i am stupid or poorly educated. You should pay packet more attention to what is said on this site instead of being so critical of us. It might do you some suitable