Anyone else agree that pumping Ian Huntleys stomach be a gross idle away of public money?
The screw that found him would have save the British tax payer millions if he'd enjoy turned a blind eye.
Answer:
No Gent. It's horrible having your stomach pumped I believe. I'd salary for him to have it done every light of day. Plus lots of injections, enemas, and other tortuous medical practices! Let him have it.
i would pump him full of arsenic..that trash should be shot!
True.
Ummm I don't know. I think passing would be an easy cop-out for him. Let him rot contained by jail till he dies of behind the times age I say
Yep, totally agree.
Where is the sprite in that? if he kill himself, then he is not suffering surrounded by jail for a hideous crime. I agree that we own paid for that, but I don't want to escape his punishment.
No i dont reckon it was a throw away of time, Huntley should be kept alive and made to suffer in prision for what he did. To agree to him commit suicide would be letting him take the flowing option out! Huntley should be made to rot and suffer surrounded by prision for what he did to those 2 little angels! May they rest in peace
No
Keep the b****** alive to suffer.
yes, but the prison would be surrounded by big trouble if he succeeded..the investigation into a suicide at an HMP costs way more than a stomach pump..
instinct says- consent to him go. one smaller quantity nasty evil soul about, however instead, why should he escape a life sentence, those poor kiddies and their relatives haven't? its a moral dilemma.
Why should he be left to appropriate the easy course out ! Let him suffer as he has made the little girls family suffer !! Personally i would love to slowly torture the ******
Yes. i don't agree with bloodshed anyone, but if he wants to die, consent to him. The world would be a better place without him contained by it
In part I would agree next to you, but what if being contained by prison is worse for him than death. Wouldn't it be better to agree to him suffer his worst fear for longer than to gain release by suicide.
Nope I purely hope that it hurt him! All paedio's should have their sexual organs removed.
Yeah, i reckon that they should enjoy saved the contents of his stomach and afford it him for breakfast this morning!
No he obviously requirements to die so i think we should formulate him suffer by keepin him alive, he deserves to be unhappy!
no, the bastard requirements to die, let him spend the rest of his existence behind bar
No I disagree.
Ian Huntley does does not deserve the dignity of being competent to escape from all he have done by killing himself.
Although some would argue that his release would bring closure to the victim's families, I quality that knowing that this sick, twisted, excuse for a man being locked contained by a room to dwell upon the evil acts he have committed would bring greater comfort.
It is clear that Huntley is feeling great cramp for what he has done so tolerate the pain verbs by keeping him alive.
Its a dilemma, keep him alive and label him suffer, although prison seems to be a bit cushy currently, or execute him and wipe him off the planet once and for adjectives.
I would go for execution.Its costing the tariff payer a hell of a lot of money to maintain him alive. Also if I was the girls parents I deduce I would want an end to it and thats just going to come when this fiend is late!
I agree that death is too apt for him. It would be his easy means of access out, but does he suffer in lock away? He has to be provided beside food, warmth, clothing, entertainment, condition care, (that like mad of people outside lock up can't get), dental treatment, (have you tried to find a dentist), has to be treated next to 'respect'..AND THIS PUNISHMENT?!
If he wants to die after give him the opportunity to die approaching a man, hand him over to the family of those two girls.
I think any finding on life within prison or death by suicide ( or any other form) should be made contained by conjunction with the parents/family of the victims. Its OK for us to read aloud 'Oh keep him alive to suffer never-ending years of confinement' but that may also prevent the victims families from any sort of 'escape' until he is six foot under. I agree it could be see as the easy choice for him, & I wouldnt lose a seconds sleep if he have been successful . Apparently when he is economically enough to return to prison, if he is consequently kept under 24 hours surveillance it will cost approx lb500,000 per year at todays costs to hold on to him inside, so if he lives for say another 50 years we are looking at lb25,000,000 (+ plentifully more allowing for inflation )to prolong the life of someone who have no place in civilised society, so its afterwards argued ...whats the point of that. If its intended that he should never be released then why not donate him the tools to kill himself..we adjectives know he's more than capable
if he have manage to assassinate himself he would no longer be suffering as he should be ..why not just put him within prison with lifers and agree to them deal near him .that way he can hold a slow painful departure the kind he should own ...he should not get treatment for an condition or injures just permit the sickness take over his body and agree to him die in twinge .for the pain he course them little girls and the affliction there family have to cope near everyday