Would you fairly see a cure for cancer or HIV/Aids? i know the two are sensitive issue but i purely want to hear
your opinion and why your choice
Answer: I believe that these cures exists but due to money that can be made from research it will never come to bedside light.
as for HIV/Aids I would like to see a cure but not the cure to administer license for promicious sex to continue. As a gay man knowing those diseases are out here does keep me (a) a abiding level. however my religious convictions share me to restrain from being a slut or ho.
BOTH!
And zilch would make me happier.
I spend several hours every day inquiring for one for both.
As a matter of reality, I'm running a comparison program for several known protein kinase inhibitors right in a minute. In between I play on answers and read.
Edit:
It's a sad sorry world when someone will thumbs down an answer close to mine.
HIV/AIDS because many times cancer can be treated near chemotherapy at the time HIV/AIDS, because it in an infectious disease that like mad of people unknowingly find. It is passed onto children, unknowing sexual partners (sometimes even when protection is used), and it is virtually tear apart entire nations and wipe out generations of poverty stricken folks, leaving countless children near no parents. On top of that is it breeding a crime swell - adults raping children thinking it will cure them and plenty of other horrible things.
CANCER on the other hand, is a disease the ending few generations hold experienced. There is astounding research showing that doing simple things as taking nutritional supplements can as much as halve your probability of getting some cancers - and even so people still shun it. Same near eating a impartial diet and plenty of fruit and vegetables. On top of that a lot of cancer have environmental cause, not to mention the huge numbers of smokers that get cancer and die.
Now I'm specifically not saying if you receive cancer it is your own fault...(my mother have a rather long scuffle with it herself and countless other culture I know). What I'm saying is within are preventative measures to cancer and most people are not taking them or at most minuscule not taking them seriously. Along with preventatives here are also quite a few treatments that are working justifiably well at the moment.
To me intuitively I think HIV/AIDS is the more pressing of the 2, although I would love to see a sunshine when there is a cure for both.
certainly the alternatives for both are pretty much the same.
You enjoy to get the PH in proportion and get your body oxygenated near antioxidents, metabolized with amino acids, enzymes and.. so forth.
http://www.gerson.com
http://www.doctoryourself.com/gersonspee...
http://peopleinaction.com/gersontherapy/
http://www.alternativehealth.co.nz/cance...
http://www.drday.com
Both are already curable, the stuff is in recent times locked up. I personally own a lot of experience restorative people beside alternative cancer therapies (ie. relatives), whereas I've never be in the position to oblige an AIDS patient, so I hold no experience in the latter nouns. Although I know a doctor who has used ozone beside a lot of sucess for aids so I do not doubt it could aid.
I'm not sure which I'd rather hold a cure for (assuming non existed). My guess is that it would be aids for 2 reasons;
The first is that the cure used for cancer is predictable to be far more invasive and damaging (ie technically chemo is a "cure" but it kill the body in the process).
The second is that adjectives these STDs running around make it like mad harder to have unprotected sex and the world would be cooler if you could do that again to all comers like it be in the 60s.
I don't know which disease is more awful and sore to die from, so I can't really evaluate them on that criteria. Hence, assuming a cure for neither existed, I would choose HIV/Aids.
*I basically agree near lindas response, but it has one truthful error. Anti oxidants do not oxygenate your body.
Oxygenation therapies (ozone and peroxide especially) gun down both conditions pretty well, but neither is generate via anti oxidants. Those prevent free radical despoil.