Is this a valid alternative method to find cancer? Would it be more accurate than an MRI or a bone scan?
It seem so quick and fast. You do not have need of million dollar machines and a lot of experts. No radiology fees, no lab fees. So simple.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX_6kSM34...
Answer: Evidence based research hasn't shown muscle conducting tests to be conclusive. It's still subjective for doctor and patient. So no, I don't find this a valid alternative method for finding cancer..
This is pseudo-scientific drivel. It would be bad plenty if it
were simple quackery. Unfortunately, it provides hope to ignorant dupes who don't get the drift anything about science or medicine.
I ruminate people like "Doctor" Overman should be prosecuted and prevented from corrupting the romantic, innocent, and hopeless.
Tom (College professor and cancer survivor).
that is dangerous quackery. It is complete and utter gobbledygook.
Most AltMed just wastes your time and money beside useless treatments of nondiseases, but this kind of thing get me really angry. People could die if they had an actual cancer and this idiot tells them they don't
"muscle testing" is a stupid naturopathic technique. Guess what..he pushes harder or smaller quantity hard. Thats how it "works"..
No