Some quick reasons why the current health system in the U.S. is better than socialized medicine?
I have need of some quick reasons, near sources (who said it, where said it, where you found it, whatever), for a newspaper. Please no arguments- I already know them. Right now I need the other side.
Answer: Milton Friedman have argued that health care system within the United States is partly socialist, and suggestions for improving medical system by expanding the role of organization would move health care to a completely socialist system. According to Friedman, third jamboree payment system in the United States is communist and properly it has communist results.
The first system of socialized medicine base on compulsory insurance with state subsidy was created by Otto von Bismarck after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. Socialized condition care was implement by the Soviet Union in the 1920s. New Zealand was the first country next to a mixed economy to provide the direct provision of health support by the state when, in 1939, it provided mental health services free of cost to the receiver following the passing of the Social Security Act of 1938. After World War II in the 1940s the United Kingdom established its National Health Service which be built from the outset as a comprehensive service. A socialized model was used in China within from the 1950s to the 1970s during the first two decades of communist rule. Cuba adopted socialized medicine within the 1960s under the leadership of Fidel Castro. Also contained by the 1960s, the United States initiated its Medicaid program to help poor mothers and their children.
A blogster (second link below) make the following observations:
I looked at the statistics of breast cancer among several countries. The chart that I used was at http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/sta... It is pretty easy to analize.
Based on the statistics, contained by the United States you have an 81% chance of surviving breast cancer. Look at the United Kingdom. You enjoy a 72% chance of survival. Our northern neighbors, and role models give you a 75% unsystematic of surviving breast cancer. Some may look at this as an argument against universal health thinking, since every country with the more advanced and modern health exactness, unlike the obsolete private system in the U.S. However, you hold to look at the big picture.
The third link below reinforces the first entry from Wikipedia and provides some historical perspective as well as its own sources.
The fourth, and final, correlation below provides links to several other good sources for you. Good luck!.
While I believe everyone deserves healthcare, there is a use why the US has some of the best doctors and researchers in the world. If within is profit to be made in medicine, next there is a big incentive for people to come up next to new procedures, medicines, and vaccines. It also creates profusely of competition to keep medical breakthroughs happening swift.
In some ways, you could say Europe gets socialized condition care without truly paying the full social cost, since they benefit from our breakthroughs just as we do..
You may get some answers here...
Website for "Americans for free choice contained by medicine"
http://www.afcm.org/freemarketnotenemy.h...
Good luck with your paper!.
It costs four times as much as it used to?
Sorry, I wont be much relieve here.
PS: Randall, does that statistic figure in the 30% of Americans who can't afford healthcare coverage? I'm guessing not..
There aren't any. The current U.S. condition system is as corrupt as our current government.